| |
|
|
|
 |
Posted 2009-11-09, 03:26 PM
in reply to Demosthenes's post starting "You're going to resort to ad hominem..."
|
|
|
|
Nice dodge of the question, why are you so mad? I thought Indians were supposed to be nice people, or are the dots different than the feathers? I'm not even arguing the possibility of a device that could sustain maintainability forever, I know at our point in time in history that is impossible. What you are saying is that it will never be possible, where I am saying it is completely still possible.
Quote:
|
If you're going to talk about perpetual motion and "free energy" pick up a fucking book and learn some terminology. Otherwise shut the fuck up about a subject you clearly know nothing about.
|
Can you give me a better word than perpetual that would better suit a machine that could run beyond the existance of our own human race? I never even said energy could be created. I said 'free energy' back in 2003, which was about the first time that I had ever even heard the term.
My whole original purpose was saying a machine could be created that would produce more energy than is used. The arguments you are making are out of the context of the actual idea based in this thread.
 
Quote:
|
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
|
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Last edited by D3V; 2009-11-09 at 03:36 PM.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode