Funny Poster

D3V: I need to get on zelaron more. I'm having withdrawls.
Skurai: You should be used to withdrawls by now, D3V.
!King_Amazon!: It's "withdrawals" you illiterate douchebags
Grav: Haha

Jesus isn't brown... He's clear.

Funny, though I'm not sure about the anti-war part.

You have asked a great question! Jesus would never go to war, for example when Jesus was about to be arrested and they were about to take him into custody, the apostle Peter took a sword and cut off the ear of the slave of the high priest, Jesus healed it and said that all those who take the sword will perish by the sword (please see Matthew 26:52 & John 18:10). Jesus also said you will know persons of the true faith by the love they have among themselves (please see John 13:35). Throughout history "Christians" go to war and kill their fellow members of their same religion and people of different religions, but Jesus said that we should even love our enemies (please see Matthew 5:44). Peace to you. Source(s): The Holy Bible

I would probably tend to agree with the notion that Jesus wouldn't support war, in general. His "turn the other cheek" thing would probably imply as much. The only way I could really see Jesus being alright with war would be if his father were to somehow demand it.

In the context of the sign, I think it definitely applies. Jesus would almost certainly not support the "war on terror."

This is a sign everyone can get a good laugh about. It may be from different perspectives, but we're all laughing. Other than Mdselctr. He doesn't laugh.

Stealing this for FB

49 “I have come to bring fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled! 50 But I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is completed! 51 Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division. 52 From now on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against two and two against three. 53 They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law.”

I agree with you mostly, I'm just saying that the generalization that he is anti-war isn't entirely accurate.

That's about a family dispute. And it's pretty much right.
It doesn't even seem pro-war, or whatever. It just seems like some leading-up-to-Revelations crap he was always pulling.