Zelaron Gaming Forum  
Stats Arcade Portal Forum FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
Go Back   Zelaron Gaming Forum > The Zelaron Nexus > Science and Art

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next

 
Reply
Posted 2015-04-19, 01:35 PM in reply to Chruser's post starting "\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{x(\cos..."
Thanks for the comments!

And sorry, it's clear that the way my final expression displays makes its meaning ambiguous. The expression in block parenthesis is not meant to be part of the exponent. Perhaps this makes the integral clearer



Does that look any more analytically approachable to anyone? Meh, it probably doesn't matter since my result doesn't hold for anything more than d=1.

It's a little unclear to me how I would find a theoretical average for which is why I haven't used my first integral directly. I simply don't know how to compute it. This is why I introduced the variables. Perhaps I could compute the average of R by assuming it to be a sum of the and using the central limit theorem, but then I need both the average and standard deviation of my . It's also completely possible that what I'm saying is complete gibberish right now, I'm just thinking out loud.

I'm unfamiliar with stochastic integrals, and what difficulties might be introduced when replacing with . I figured that the process is okay, though, since by definition



and therefore



My suspicion is also that my calculation for the average of the exponential is wrong. One possible pitfall in my model is that for fixed j the are not independent, since only one member of that subset can be nonzero, which I have not accounted for explicitly. I know that for random variables there are sometimes extra terms that need to be added for certain operations that you wouldn't expect, i.e



where M is the measure of a set. The last term comes up somewhat unexpectedly unless you've thought about that kind of operation before. I'm not sure if there might be something like that in the computation of the exponential average that I might not have accounted for. That's something I can look into.

The alternative solution I'm considering trying is to decompose my R vector a little differently. I'm thinking of having a single per step ranging from 1 to 2d. I can then write

.

This means that would increment by +1 if and -1 if , would increment by +1 if and -1 if and so on. This should decompose my R correctly as far as I can tell, and should get rid of any dependency issues that come up since there is only one per step. I'll try this later today and let you know if it works. I'll also look into how to calculate the average of a sum of mutually dependent variables.

Thanks again, guys.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules [Forum Rules]
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Random 35 Tracks Tape. Mdselctr Science and Art 1 2009-09-24 04:59 PM
Random Title Chruser Forum News, Suggestions and Discussion 29 2002-05-14 08:16 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 PM.
'Synthesis 2' vBulletin 3.x styles and 'x79' derivative
by WetWired the Unbound and Chruser
Copyright ©2002-2008 zelaron.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.