Does this require more time than debating? (I don't see how it would...)
If not, I sign up.
Cool, we got our 3. I don't think it should require more time than debating. It should be in Zelaron Melee fashion, so we should be good. I'll write out judges guidelines later. Testssss tomorrow.
Actually, I agree with both sides. If you are still actively smoking pot, then you are biased. If you have smoked in the past and have simply outgrew it, that's a different scenario, because you are knowledgable on the subject, but biased by it's influence at the moment.
On that note, I'd like to disbar !K_A! and nominate myself. Hahaha...
Actually, I agree with both sides. If you are still actively smoking pot, then you are biased. If you have smoked in the past and have simply outgrew it, that's a different scenario, because you are knowledgable on the subject, but biased by it's influence at the moment.
On that note, I'd like to disbar !K_A! and nominate myself. Hahaha...
Funnily enough I smoked in the past and now I don't so there.
Is it still too late to do another debate, Christ?
I smoke weed off and on, relatively regularly, and I am for and against the legalization (more like for decriminalization). That being said, if I hear much more about this subject I might puke. The marijuana debate has been flooding the internet media for the past few years (much more since Cannibus Club was founded) and hasn't gotten anywhere useful. It's WAY overblown and tired.
Il papa caca nei legno?
Last edited by RoboticSilence; 2007-04-14 at 09:47 AM.
Is it still too late to do another debate, Christ?
I smoke weed off and on, relatively regularly, and I am for and against the legalization (more like for decriminalization). That being said, if I hear much more about this subject I might puke. The marijuana debate has been flooding the internet media for the past few years (much more since Cannibus Club was founded) and hasn't gotten anywhere useful. It's WAY overblown and tired.
Fuck I agree with you but the board's full of stoners who want to debate about something they feel strongly about. So, I guess this is a good first one to get everyone involved.
If you want to judge the marijuana debate, sign up here. I'm going to be judge #1, so we need 2 more. First two to sign up get it.
Mj you need 4 judges. One who smokes. One who has never smoked. One who has smoked but stopped. One who didn't smoke till later down the road (like 29 or 30 years).
That way you can get an opinion from all the different positions smokers may be in while you get one from a non smoker.