I wouldn't think so, however. Porn stars are paid professionals and, generally, are willing to do just about anything. Also, I find it hard to picture non-pstars changing positions 37 times per session. It just seems a bit much. I very well could be wrong, though.
(Btw, this isn't philosophy, and I have a hard time finding a logical reason as to why it could be called science other than the scientific method of theories.)
D3V said:
This message is hidden because D3V is on your ignore list.
Sex doesn't "last" as long, to put it that way. They pile that all on over a whole day with magazines and other stuff. And some people have never even heard of/seen some of those positions they use.
Sex doesn't "last" as long, to put it that way. They pile that all on over a whole day with magazines and other stuff. And some people have never even heard of/seen some of those positions they use.
Hey yo that aint everybody.. (you shoulda pulled a "Most People")
Ive stayed up for 27 minutes so HA!
(no homoness involved I hate faggots to death and wish them to all burn)
It depends on the people involved. Porn *is* sex, but it is very unlikely to be even remotely alike a typical sexual act among "normal people".
"Stephen Wolfram is the creator of Mathematica and is widely regarded as the most important innovator in scientific and technical computing today." - Stephen Wolfram
Heh, some girls are freaks, some aren't. Some like doing it in all kinds of different positions, some are conservative and only do missionary. Depends if the partners are sexually active, if they have fun with it (A.K.A. - Not "making love" all the time, and just fucking), and what they like.