As a nurse that isn't really my job, so it isn't really a concern. I would assume that babies are simple enough and exist in large enough quantities that it isn't very difficult to associate their symptoms/behaviors with some causes, though. I could probably even argue that babies can't lie, unlike adult patients, so you are less likely to be mislead by them not being truthful or actively hiding information from you.
I could probably even argue that babies can't lie, unlike adult patients, so you are less likely to be mislead by them not being truthful or actively hiding information from you.
Perhaps their overly concerned parents that accompany them will be happy to fill you in with the required (m/d)isinformation to make your prospective job a fun challenge.
Then again, if Dawkins is to be believed, IIRC, a parent is only a little more than half as concerned with the survival of their child as they are about their own, so with some luck, they'll give you a break.
"Stephen Wolfram is the creator of Mathematica and is widely regarded as the most important innovator in scientific and technical computing today." - Stephen Wolfram
Right, your job isn't to determine the cause of whatever has them in the hospital, but there is secondary stuff that you would need to respond to and it's harder when the patient just cries and can't tell you that they have a headache or that thier arm is numb or whatever.