Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright.
The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it.
Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright.
The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it.
Christ K_A, you honestly think that I don't know the difference between the fucking avatar and one single post with boobs in it? You are just trying to be a jackass now and disagree. You are too dense to even comprehend what I've been saying to you, therefourth you fail, again.
Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Then make a thing that allows you to block someone's avatar and/or sig. But ya. Those are some friken big boobs!
Asamin said:
Nice. Got him owned there. Poor guy.
I haven't posted in this thread until now just because getting in the middle would be unwise, but posting stuff like this is just unnecessary.
First, it's not that easy to just, "Hmm, I guess I could make a avatar filter." WW has too little time as it is to implement such a feature if possible.
And two, I honestly don't feel that anyone got "owned" here. It's a legitimate discussion and the goal shouldn't/isn't to humiliate the other to prove your own dominance.
Hybrid Mode
