Shrink this for me?

Avoid indecent/sexually suggestive content in signature and avatar especially, since users do not have the option to block only your signature/avatar.

As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.

As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.

Hope you don't mind explaining it again in a week when he tries again. If you haven't noticed yet, he's pretty dense.

Goddamnit, these rules need to change, seriously. First you say no nudity, then you say no partial nudity, then you say no nudity if they are technically nude (hand bra), then no partial nudity or partly nude etc. Meh. I just want a new avatar.

No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.

This is how it always has been and always will be.

I'm not blocked and I still post borderline shit in my posts, so basically that's a rule that doesn't hold true to anything.

I'm not blocked and I still post borderline shit in my posts, so basically that's a rule that doesn't hold true to anything.

What the hell are you talking about?

What the hell are you talking about?

No, the rule is not NO NUDITY for sigs/avatars, it's no indecency. You can post indecency(borderline nudity) in posts, as long as it isn't nudity, but you can't put it in a sig or avatar, because people cannot turn that off, and they cannot avoid it.

Avoid, block same thing. What i'm saying is the people that do get PMS about it don't have me blocked anyways, so wouldn't it essentially be ineffective as rule/feature?

This isn't about what's in posts. Obviously, this is fine as a post, because you're not banned. The rules for avatars and sigs are different from the rules for posts.

I know, WW.

el gay

i miss the avatar i had for like a week...

Cleveage isn't indecent, matter of fact I love it.

Cleveage isn't indecent, matter of fact I love it.

Rule for posts:

All humanoids in posted or linked to pictures or sites must be clothed.

Rule for Sigs/Avatars:

Avoid indecent/sexually suggestive content in signature and avatar especially, since users do not have the option to block only your signature/avatar.

If you post that image in a thread, I can avoid it to prevent from getting in trouble at work or wherever. If you put it in a signature or avatar, I cannot avoid it, because any thread you've posted in will have it. This is why the rule is more strict for signatures and avatars.

As I've already explained, pictures featuring pretty much just breasts fall into the catagory "sexually suggestive", never mind what the animation is. For like the tenth time: allowed in posts, not allowed in sig or avy.

Awwww come on. Let him do it. You know all the guys here would love it!

Except for the ones who have jobs and visit from work and could potentially get fired for it.

Those boobs are too big.

yeaaaaa. i dont wanna see that