Court takes sex predator's home

Taking his computer or video camera whatever, those can be evidence. But confiscating his home after he purchased and paid taxes on it? Unlegit.

I agree with both of you. Completely wrong, in my opinion.

yea, thats rediculous. making him move is one thing, but just TAKING his house? eh i'm not so sure.

"He has other houses in other jurisdictions," Brownfield said. "Hopefully, he won't be back to Englewood."

At least he won't be homeless.

In arguing for the forfeiture, Stanek said, Gillingham needed the privacy of his house to commit crimes, including child pornography

Thought this was funny. Take his house! He could commit a crime there! Nice logic dude.