Zelaron Gaming Forum  
Stats Arcade Portal Forum FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
Go Back   Zelaron Gaming Forum > The Zelaron Nexus > General Discussion > Opinion and Debate

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

 
Reply
Posted 2007-03-27, 04:00 PM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "This world would be a lot more peaceful..."
But we'd also have less people to argue at... a much quieter place t'would be.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Lenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basicsLenny simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
Lenny
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-03-27, 04:16 PM in reply to Lenny's post starting "But we'd also have less people to argue..."
Perhaps people could talk about more important things. How often do people go to war over science? There are scientific debates, there are scientists that disagree about things, but they don't go to war over it. I'm not saying the world would be war free without religion, but it would be a much safer and more peaceful place. People claim religion gives people morals as they go and slaughter families in other countries simply because they disagree with them. We're "helping them" by forcing our religion on them.

Unfortunately, religion will never cease to exist.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-03-28, 10:14 AM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "Perhaps people could talk about more..."
!K¡ng_Amazon! said:
Perhaps people could talk about more important things. How often do people go to war over science? There are scientific debates, there are scientists that disagree about things, but they don't go to war over it.
You don't remember the cold war do you? It was a war of power and technology lead the way... Everyone did and still do want atomic power...
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Draco is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenDraco is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
Draco
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-03-28, 10:32 AM in reply to Draco's post starting "You don't remember the cold war do you?..."
Draco said:
You don't remember the cold war do you? It was a war of power and technology lead the way... Everyone did and still do want atomic power...
That was mostly a war over power and bragging rights than a war over science, but it was indeed partially a war over science.

Like I said, I don't think the world would be perfect without religion, but it would definately be a big leap closer.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-03-29, 08:00 AM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "That was mostly a war over power and..."
!K¡ng_Amazon! said:
That was mostly a war over power and bragging rights than a war over science, but it was indeed partially a war over science.

Like I said, I don't think the world would be perfect without religion, but it would definately be a big leap closer.
All I was saying is that if science had not created the power we woulden't have had the war....
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Draco is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenDraco is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
Draco
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-03-29, 08:04 AM in reply to Draco's post starting "All I was saying is that if science had..."
Tell me how many people died in the cold war Draco.

I know there were casualties, but really, most of them were due to training accidents.

http://www.3ad.org/coldwar/coldwar_casualties.htm

"Most of the casualties died in training accidents"
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics!King_Amazon! simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
!King_Amazon!
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-03-30, 08:39 AM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "Tell me how many people died in the..."
!K¡ng_Amazon! said:
Tell me how many people died in the cold war Draco.

I know there were casualties, but really, most of them were due to training accidents.

http://www.3ad.org/coldwar/coldwar_casualties.htm

"Most of the casualties died in training accidents"
I know there were no war casualities, but if it had begun a full scale war, we possibly would not be here posting right now... Also, you are missing the point... the only reason I brought up hitler was to prove that science can lead to war, in this case a world war....

Now tell me... after all the scientific proof I have shown you you still believe in evolution?! I mean come on... the bombardier beetle could not have evolved, no matter how fast or slow... it would have killed itself(loud pop, then silence...) or been killed off... also, if you think about evolution, it is a perfect system... in order for evolution to work the 'evolved' creature would have to be only survivor in order for the benifit to survive, otherwise the benifit would have been spliced back into the gene pool... if you look at dogs, they have been breeded for specific traits... the more you breed the less of a gene pool you have to pull from... take a toy poodle(example) it's smaller than a normal poodle, but if you breed two toy poodles together you can only get a toy poodle(of equal or lesser size)... this is a loss of information, everytime a dog is breeded to be smaller or longer or whatever the genetic traits from being tall or short are weeded out.... so there is no gain of information, there is always a loss.... so for evolution to work our ancestors must have had similar genetics to our ancestors....
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Draco is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenDraco is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
Draco
 



 

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules [Forum Rules]
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:44 AM.
'Synthesis 2' vBulletin 3.x styles and 'x79' derivative
by WetWired the Unbound and Chruser
Copyright ©2002-2008 zelaron.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.