You're saying that because Sub Zero fought MK opponents he's better... "Has Ryu ever fought ______ (insert random MK fighter) ? NO!?! Game Over!!"
That's absolutely not a factor in this fight, and there is a damned good reason for it. I could, logically, say the same for Sub Zero, right? Has Sub Zero ever fought... say... Blanka? No? Game over, Ryu pwns him.
The reason you can't pick a random character (bosses included) and say that his experience fighting the aforementioned character makes him stronger than the opponent is because we haven't established which game has stronger characters.
It may be true that any random MK fighter might get his everloving ass smashed by any random SF fighter. The opposite may be true. The fact of the matter is that what we are arguing is a specific example of this question. Therefore, it doesn't matter who Sub Zero has fought before. Ryu is a new type of combatant.
Go Ryu!
D3V said:
This message is hidden because D3V is on your ignore list.
I'd just like to take a bit of time and mention the possibility of this arena not being very conducive to projectiles. There are a lot of obstacles and very little open space. I think the deciding factor is who is the better close-range combatant, and I'd have to give it to Ryu on this one.
Hybrid Mode
