Or so it would appear. I recently purchased "Oblagon" by Syd Mead for $270.77; one of his rarest illustration books which was released in a limited edition in 1985:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MEWN:IT&ih=017
I won the auction on December 23, and I have monitored the sales of books by Syd Mead on eBay after that as well, hoping to find some of his other works.
As it turns out, there is a total of FOUR Oblagon books on sale today:
http://search.ebay.com/search/search...gon&category0=
I found this number a bit large, so I decided to investigate the auctions. Two of the them are held by the same person who sold my copy of Oblagon. Aside for the difference in initial price, the auctions are
identical as far as their description and images go. So, maybe he just happened to keep three first-edition
"MINT CONDITION UNUSED BRAND NEW [copies] OF SYD MEAD'S BOOK" in his secret airlock vault until this very day to sell them, no big deal. What worries me is that:
- The two sellers involved (both selling two copies of Oblagon each) use remarkably similar grammar and consistent capitalization throughout their descriptions, and feedback left for other eBay members.
- Both sellers' feedback records rely heavily on the sales of inexpensive movie posters, in stark contrast to selling expensive collectors' items. (Good way to establish lots of positive feedback in as little time as possible).
- Both sellers use several, identical scans of Oblagon pages, at slightly different resolutions. (Look at the scan lines and scanner defects).
- Both sellers use the same image host, with similar watermarks.
- One of the auctions, by the person I purchased my book from, utilizes the "buy it now" feature, priced at $180. If he previously sold me one of his extremely "rare" books for $270.77 after an intensive fight amongst bidders, why would he accept a quick sale for $180 for an item of the same quality?
This just doesn't add up. What other reason is there to divide your sales of rare books amongst two different accounts, than to take a negative feedback impact as small as possible? Governing the fact that only a few days have passed since I purchased my copy of Oblagon, I may be able to get my money back if I can prove my case. My guess is that the sellers' plan is to reassure his buyers that the items have been shipped, and hope they don't invoke the 45 day fraud protection rule.
Thoughts? Advice? If you see any patterns that I missed, let me know.
Also, here are the links to the four, current auctions, in case they don't show up in the link above:
http://cgi.ebay.com/OBLAGON-CONCEPT-...QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/OBLAGON-CONCEPTS...QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/OBLAGON-CONCEPTS...QQcmdZViewItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/OBLAGON-CONCEPT-...QQcmdZViewItem
Oh, and please leave the seller and his to-be buyers alone. Even if you would convince one of his current high bidders to withdraw from the auctions, someone else is most certain to win the auction with the "last 20 seconds surprise bid" strategy anyway. eBay is more likely to take fraud reports seriously if several buyers file them.
"Stephen Wolfram is the creator of Mathematica and is widely regarded as the most important innovator in scientific and technical computing today." - Stephen Wolfram