War with Iraq?

Snipers are against the United Nations rules. Unless you are in war. The Geniva Convention says that you must be under war conditions to send in snipers.

For those who dont know, the Geniva Convention are basically rules of war.

wtf i cant even keep reading u guys bullshit... ppl of iraq love saddam, so US didt even care about the ppl, and go half around of the world and say u got weapon we dont like i got to kill u sorry. wtf... wut if russian say US got nuclear weapon disarm it or i going nuke u us? ah

THE fact is there are people who don't like sadaam. He just tends to kill them off. Maybe if you had the threat of living where you were the target of all madmen and terrorist you'd understand.

UN been in Iraq for like month seaching and say they found nothing y is bush keep saying they got like mad weapon.... do bush have any prove yet?....

The fact is he's been "somewhat" cooperative.

He's a known offender. Are we supposed to sit back and wait like we did in WW2? Sure let's have another Pearl Harbor. The truth is there are civilized countries and uncivilized countries. Sadaam cannot be considered civilized for the reasons he has demonstrated in the past.

Impressive kwhii. I don't know how you managed to decifer those jumbled posts and make sense of them enough to respond. I had to take a double and triple take at em just to make sure I wasn't seeing things. Is ganga pinoy-real?

I think he is forgein.. with a limited grip on the english language. Or at least my guess anyway. And this also answers my question ealier about people from foreign countries and if they understand our stance or not.

Did I just read that someone says that Saddam is loved in Iraq. Oh, I must be mistaken, considering he has killed his own people. "Gee, I love our genocidal leader. Let us give upo our lives for his amusement. Yay!" NOT! They do not all love him. Jeeze people, think before you write. It is emabrassing some of the stuff you people write.

Bush says he has to disarm Iraq... does this mean we are going to have a nucleur war? I hope not.

Bush says he has to disarm Iraq... does this mean we are going to have a nucleur war? I hope not.

Don't we all hope not?

Is Sadaam that stupid? Is Bush that stupid? Let's hope not.

I am not against war.... Just against the stupidity of Nuclear wars.

Bush is evil. A)

I just don't like how every once so often someone brings out the point that 'Saddam is a madman and therefore has to be removed of power'. I believe that Saddam is only a madman in an attempt to keep his country together and not out begging on the streets. even if someone comes and remove Saddam, its going to take someone even more or as ruthless as Saddam to keep Iraq together. if not, then its most likely divide in three and start a civil war.

Honestly, I'd rather see him out of power, out of his dictatorship, and away from killing innocent citizens of his "together" country. We aren't just going to take him out and let Iraq deteriorate. We have the citizen's freedom's on our mind, and we are willing to go to war for them. Why do people fail to see that we are only trying to help.

Take off your opaque, obscuring glasses and check out the good in America for a change, rather just some of the few flaws we, like every nations exhibits.

Take off your opaque, obscuring glasses and check out the good in America for a change, rather just some of the few flaws we, like every nations exhibits.

That would be nice, but their will always be negative people. And the nuclear war thing. In case some of you didn't know, Iraq does have allies. For instance, Russia. Yes, Russia. If we fired nukes at Iraq, we would be screwed. Plus, now the U.S. has only small allies. No Germany, etc. When we go to war, we will be fighting alone. So, any way you look at it, we are screwed. I am still for taking down Saddam, but I just don't like the idea of another 9-11, if you get my drift.

1) Russia would never join Sadaam and fight against us in war. Especially if Iraq attacked first and we retalliated.

2) Our allies are not small. We have plenty back, and trust me, when they join us, our force will be a united one, with much strength, much greater than one that can be produced by the U.S. alone.

I fear not this war. If we don't attack Iraq, only more deaths would occur, and for all the wrong reasons.

Am I confused? Didn't Tony Blair back the U.S.? Or has the situation changed?

Tony Blair is afraid to get too close to the elephant. all of the things you see him on TV is all for show.

1) Russia would never join Sadaam and fight against us in war. Especially if Iraq attacked first and we retalliated. 2) Our allies are not small. We have plenty back, and trust me, when they join us, our force will be a united one, with much strength, much greater than one that can be produced by the U.S. alone. I fear not this war. If we don't attack Iraq, only more deaths would occur, and for all the wrong reasons.

Well, we don't have Germany, or any other world powers any more. Some guy offended them or something. All we have are small countries. No England, Germany, France, nothing. Just small countries to help out

Well, we ahve England and France, but France is being a bunch of douchebag's because they have ties with Iraq and their oil. Well, they better realize that if you don't take off with someone, you sure as hell ain't gonna land with em!

I have a hunch they will come around...

I would be more afraid of North Korea.