Zelaron Gaming Forum  
Stats Arcade Portal Forum FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Zelaron Gaming Forum > The Zelaron Nexus > General Discussion > Opinion and Debate

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

 
Reply
Posted 2008-11-07, 10:39 AM in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "Didn't read it, lolz at you. I might..."
After reading this I can safely say that yes, this guy is a fanatical. Some of the things you said I'll agree with but most of the others, Premise 14, for example you just sound like a religious nut.

I read this on the Internet somewhere:

"There's probably no God, so stop worrying and enjoy your life."
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Thanatos simplifies with no grasp of the basicsThanatos simplifies with no grasp of the basicsThanatos simplifies with no grasp of the basicsThanatos simplifies with no grasp of the basicsThanatos simplifies with no grasp of the basicsThanatos simplifies with no grasp of the basics
 
 
Thanatos
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-11-08, 10:55 AM in reply to Thanatos's post starting "After reading this I can safely say..."
Thanatos said: [Goto]
After reading this I can safely say that yes, this guy is a fanatical. Some of the things you said I'll agree with but most of the others, Premise 14, for example you just sound like a religious nut.

I read this on the Internet somewhere:

"There's probably no God, so stop worrying and enjoy your life."
GOD!? All religions purpose is to naturalize the oppressiveness of the culture- get people to believe that their enslavement is not simply cultural but a necessary part of existence to which they've been condemned.

Fanatic is simply a label which our culture uses to alienate and define anyone who fights the death urge. Just because I think we should all live in touch with the natural world that we are born on, rather than destroy it with every aspect of our lives means I'M THE CRAZY ONE?
activist, crazy, demon, devotee, enthusiast, extremist, fiend*, fool, freak, maniac, monomaniac, nut*, radical, ultraist, visionary, zealot

Stop lying to yourselves. KA you think indigenous peoples had ADD? Alzheimer's disease, atherosclerosis, asthma, cancer, chronic liver disease or cirrhosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes, heart disease, nephritis or chronic renal failure, osteoporosis, acne, stroke, depression and obesity. All symptoms of industrial civilization.

All females living under this culture hate themselves. You know it. I know it. They are taught from childhood to be a certain way and if they are not (and of course they are not because everyone is different) then they despise themselves and torture themselves and strain to match the cultural profile. The smoking, the drinking, the drugs are all quite obvious examples of the poisons we give to ourselves, but what about the air that they are destroying, the water, and our food. We spray chemicals on our food! OUR FOOD! There is not a square inch of this earths water or land that does not contain chemicals. Every mothers breast milk is tainted. You think it's possible to not hate ourselves and do this to our land base?
Any hated felt long enough, no longer feels like hatred. You've all been through the system along with I. You've all had your wills broken by the culture. The hours and hours of sitting in the schools, wanted to be somewhere else, doing something, dying with boredom and losing all of our rebellion and drive. While they do what? Educated YOU? HA. YOU KNOW IT'S MADNESS, YOU CAN SENSE IT AT TIMES. STOP REPRESSING YOURSELVES. How can it hurt? Just play devils advocate for a little bit.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Hayduke is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenHayduke is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
 
Hayduke
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-11-08, 11:18 AM in reply to Hayduke's post starting "GOD!? All religions purpose is to..."
I think the problem with convincing people of the validity of your anarcho-primitivism-inspired ideals is that they appear derived from assumptions. For instance, your eighteenth premise ("Our current sense of self is no more sustainable than our current use of energy or technology") does not appear valid per se, e.g. due to the fact that there are peoples who live with no energy and essentially very primitive technology yet appear to sustain their selves to a comparable extent to that of modern, industrialized man.

Of course, the disadvantages of abandoning the current state of development would be bad in quite a few ways, such as the fact that Earth by itself can not support large part of today's human population, thus large portion of humanity would succumb to starvation, violence emergent from the fight for remaining resources, et cetera.

Also, your analysis does not consider the prospect of sustaining the world utilizing the fruits of additional, technological advances. As can be inferred from my previous paragraph, technology currently allows billions of people to populate this planet. Assuming your (or Kaczynski's / Zerzan's) plans of rebellion fail, nanomanufacturing will likely arrive in 10-20 years from now (based on Kurzweil's analysis), which will thus allow humanity to control the state and composition of our resources to an order of magnitude perhaps thousands of times greater than what we can do today. Thus, the assumption that the problems of the industrialized world are permanent is likely invalid.
"Stephen Wolfram is the creator of Mathematica and is widely regarded as the most important innovator in scientific and technical computing today." - Stephen Wolfram

Last edited by Chruser; 2008-11-08 at 11:43 AM.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Chruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrowChruser never puts off to tomorrow what can be done the day after tomorrow
 
 
Chruser
 



 
Reply
Posted 2008-11-08, 06:38 PM in reply to Chruser's post starting "I think the problem with convincing..."
Chruser said: [Goto]
I think the problem with convincing people of the validity of your anarcho-primitivism-inspired ideals is that they appear derived from assumptions. For instance, your eighteenth premise ("Our current sense of self is no more sustainable than our current use of energy or technology") does not appear valid per se, e.g. due to the fact that there are peoples who live with no energy and essentially very primitive technology yet appear to sustain their selves to a comparable extent to that of modern, industrialized man.
I believe the premise 18 is referring to our sense of self as a human, or more basic as an animal. Opposed to a civilian.

Chruser said:
Of course, the disadvantages of abandoning the current state of development would be bad in quite a few ways, such as the fact that Earth by itself can not support large part of today's human population, thus large portion of humanity would succumb to starvation, violence emergent from the fight for remaining resources, et cetera.
Of course. Premise 7. 9.

Chruser said:
Also, your analysis does not consider the prospect of sustaining the world utilizing the fruits of additional, technological advances. As can be inferred from my previous paragraph, technology currently allows billions of people to populate this planet. Assuming your (or Kaczynski's / Zerzan's) plans of rebellion fail, nanomanufacturing will likely arrive in 10-20 years from now (based on Kurzweil's analysis), which will thus allow humanity to control the state and composition of our resources to an order of magnitude perhaps thousands of times greater than what we can do today. Thus, the assumption that the problems of the industrialized world are permanent is likely invalid.
Resources are but a fragment of the problems civilization causes, not to mention industrial civilization. Premise 4, 5, 12, 13, 14, 16, 19, 20
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Hayduke is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenHayduke is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
 
Hayduke
 



 

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules [Forum Rules]
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:59 AM.
'Synthesis 2' vBulletin 3.x styles and 'x79' derivative
by WetWired the Unbound and Chruser
Copyright ©2002-2008 zelaron.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.