Rules revision

In my defense, when I banned him, I didn't know what the link lead to. Heck, I don't even now. All I knew was that it was clearly not the URL that it was labeled with.

So, you banned me because the URL differed from the /hyperlink text. Nice job I guess maybe next time you should have somebody check it out for you before blindly banning instead of assuming.

I didn't have to assume. It was clearly misleading, and thus against the rules. You're accusing me over banning you for a harmless rulebreaking, when infact I didn't know it was harmless.

So everybody follow my rules and STFU. Thank you and have a blessed day.

That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm open to discussion about some rules, this one included, we just need to get past bickering about what's behind us.

No no. I'm saying everybody follow my rules about the misleading link policy. First post of this page.

I think that the not being allowed to type everything in caps is stupid.

I'd say it was a good rule if the people who abused it actually read the rules.

They don't.

AND I SHOULD BE ABLE TO YELL =D