Obligatory 'Why is D3V banned?' thread # 38

Just curious! Though I already know why I think...

Well, here's what went down through another forum exchanges.

It doesn't have to be pornographic to be against the rules. The rules say clothed. How do you figure her to be clothed?

I never said or figured she was.

So under this rule, you're going to tell me that something that would partain to somebody being naked, in essence, BUT had a censor bar over them would ALSO be against the rules? And technically, what else would be included with this rule? Say if somebody we're to post a half-naked picture of a guy with his shirt off, for example, would that break the rules? BECAUSE TECHNICALLY they wouldn't be fully clothed, if you respond with because they aren't naked would totally contradict your whole entire argument, hence, making you a hypocrit in the context of the rules which in case is overstupified and grounds for change.

You have to be clothed to go to most US beaches. Men are not required to wear tops to most US beaches, therefore... And yes, even if there are censor bars, if it is clear that the subject is not clothed, then it is against the rules.

I am posting this on behalf of the rest of the members...