Finally!#2!!

He'll be above me, actually, on account of his earlier join date.

I still reckon it ought to be listed in alphabetical order...

Keep it up, slay!

He'll be above me, actually, on account of his earlier join date. I still reckon it ought to be listed in alphabetical order... Keep it up, slay!

No it shouldn't. If you're ranking members, basing it first off of activity and then off of join date makes more sense than basing it off of activity and position in the alphabet. An old member with 100% activity should be above a newer one with 100% activity :P

Nah.

Do it alphabetically, or do it by the date they reached that activity.

To me, alphabetically makes more sense. What if someone, at the end of the alphabet, joined in 2002, didn't post at all for five years, then came back tomorrow and posted until they got 100%. Why should they get #1, rather than the person/people who have been posting since they arrived?

If anything, maybe do it by activity first, and then average posts per day second. That would make it fair-er I think.

Either way, as long as someone who called themself Zzzz, joined in 2002, posted nothing, comes back tomorrow, and posts until they get 100%, doesn't knock me off the top spot, then I'll be happy.

It's fine if slaynish does it - he's more or less posted since he joined.

congratulations on your amazing waste of time!

congratulations on your amazing waste of time!

Jealousy at it's finest.

Try to stay unbanned long enough to hit 100% plz.

Or we could do it on nationality.


Lets say...

1.Swedish yaa
2.AMERICA!
3.then brit's