Zelaron Gaming Forum  
Stats Arcade Portal Forum FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Zelaron Gaming Forum > The Zelaron Nexus > General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

 
Reply
Posted 2007-05-17, 08:35 PM in reply to Demosthenes's post starting "General Relativity The development..."
The Big Bang



A revelation from the mathematics of general relativity revealed that the universe can not be static. The universe either had to be expanding or shrinking. The idea of a non-static universe was too much for even Einstein to handle. He added a cosmological constant to his equations just to ensure that the universe stayed static. 12 years after Einstein’s mathematical formulation of general relativity, Edwin Hubble experimentally showed that the universe was expanding. Einstein went back and removed his cosmological constant from his equations and called it the biggest blunder of his life.

Since space is expanding, what would happen if time were to run in reverse? We would find that space was constantly condensing. As the universe compresses, it becomes hotter. If we run the clock back approximately 15 billion years, it would seem as though all the energy and matter in the universe, everything making up the cosmos, is condensed into a singularity. From this singularity, a rapid expansion of spacetime erupted. Originally the temperature of the universe was extremely hot. However, it is inaccurate to think of the big bang as an explosion. An explosion happens at a certain time and place. The big bang was a rapid expansion of everything.

I do not intend to cover the evolution of the universe in this post, nor do I intend to defend this theory from its (mostly non-scientific) critics. It is important to understand that this theory is not some crazy old kook’s inane rambling. It is supported by a plethora of theoretical and experimental evidence. Most likely, this theory will not be replaced. New evidence may cause scientists to revise the theory of genesis, however most physicists believe that additional evidence will support, or help develop our understanding of the big bang, not overthrow it.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-05-17, 08:41 PM in reply to Demosthenes's post starting "The Big Bang A revelation from..."
Still to come:

Wave-Particle dual nature of light
Wave-particle dual nature of matter
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
QM vs GR
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-05-17, 09:22 PM in reply to Demosthenes's post starting "Still to come: Wave-Particle dual..."
Looks good from what I got through, first four posts, I'll have to come back and get the rest when I'm sober and feel like learning.
!King_Amazon! said:
Just ask the married chick he fucked.

Who Delivers ten times out of ten?
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
MightyJoe is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenMightyJoe is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
MightyJoe
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-05-18, 04:41 PM in reply to MightyJoe's post starting "Looks good from what I got through,..."
Looking good, I love Physics.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Vollstrecker shows clear signs of ignorance and confidence; the two things needed to succeed in lifeVollstrecker shows clear signs of ignorance and confidence; the two things needed to succeed in life
 
 
Vollstrecker
 



 
The Wave-Particle Dual Nature of Light
Reply
Posted 2007-05-22, 03:25 PM in reply to Vollstrecker's post starting "Looking good, I love Physics. :D"
The Wave-Particle Dual Nature of Light

In the 17th century there was much debate about the nature of light. Newton advocated a particle nature of light, while others argued that light was a wave. Early in the 19th century, a scientist named Thomas Young carried out an experiment which is now known as the double-slit experiment. At that time Young’s conclusions nullified Newton’s theory on the nature of light.

It is worth describing Young’s double-slit experiment here, as it will provide a startling insight into the nature of matter in the next section. His experiment was simple, and is easily reproducible. Essentially, it consisted of three flat pieces of cardboard, a powerful flashlight, and a wall to shine the flashlight towards. Each piece of cardboard had slits in them. The first piece had a slit towards its left side, the second piece had a slit towards its right side, and the final piece had two slits, one on the left side and one on the right side. When the piece of cardboard with the slit on the left side was placed between the beam of light and the wall, the wall had a single “streak” of light towards the left as expected. Similarly, when the cardboard piece with the slit on the right was placed between the wall and the beam of light, a streak of light towards the right was observed. If light truly has a particulate nature then when the third piece of cardboard is placed between the beam of light and the wall then we should see two streaks of light. Instead, what is observed is an interference pattern, a wave phenomenon.

Any amount of cash you have can be represented by an integer number of pennies. This is the fundamental American currency denomination. In 1900, Max Planck postulated that there is a fundamental energy denomination for light. Light can carry energy only in integer multiples of this fundamental energy denomination. Planck also postulated that the energy carried by light is proportional to its frequency.

The phenomenon that gave us insight into the particulate nature of light is known as the photoelectric effect. By the beginning of the 20th century the phenomenon had been well established, however there was no universal concurrence in the physics community as to what the consequences of the observations were. Once again, Einstein stepped in to enlighten the physics community. He would eventually be awarded the Nobel Prize for his explanation of the photoelectric effect.

In first year chemistry, you learn that metals have loose valence electrons. This is why they are such good conductors for electricity. This is also the basis of the photoelectric effect. When light strikes a metal, it dislodges some of the valence electrons. This in itself is not too puzzling. What baffled physicists was the fact that no matter what the intensity of the light was, the dislodged electrons moved with the same speed. Intensity of light only affected the number of electrons that were dislodged.
However, if the frequency (color) of the light was changed, the speed that the electrons were ejected at changed. What was more bewildering was the fact that below a certain frequency, no electrons were ejected at all despite the blinding intensity of the light.

Einstein postulated that light was quantized in little packets called photons. This simple assumption explained all the observations of the photoelectric effect. Instead of the light-wave being dispersed evenly throughout the entire metal, implying that the intensity (total energy) of light should directly affect the energy of an ejected electron, a single photon only carried a fixed amount of energy, and this is why an electron’s speed was invariable with intensity since only a single photon will strike an electron. It also explained why electrons weren’t ejected below a certain frequency. The energy carried by the photon was simply not enough to dislodge the electron at these low frequencies. With increasing intensity, more photons were fired at the metal; therefore more photons struck and dislodged more electrons. Hence, the particulate nature of light was revealed.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-05-22, 04:13 PM in reply to Demosthenes's post "The Wave-Particle Dual Nature of Light"
This is some of the last stuff we talked about in my last physics class. And that each point of a wave can be a source. Like with light any point on the wave can be a point light source. Electrons act like both particles and waves too methinks.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Willkillforfood read his obituary with confusionWillkillforfood read his obituary with confusionWillkillforfood read his obituary with confusionWillkillforfood read his obituary with confusion
 
 
Willkillforfood
 



 
Reply
Posted 2007-05-22, 05:24 PM in reply to Willkillforfood's post starting "This is some of the last stuff we..."
Willkillforfood said:
Electrons act like both particles and waves too methinks.
That's where the real weirdness starts. That will be my next post...either tonight or tomorrow. Depends on how bored I am.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes
 



 

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules [Forum Rules]
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.
'Synthesis 2' vBulletin 3.x styles and 'x79' derivative
by WetWired the Unbound and Chruser
Copyright ©2002-2008 zelaron.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.