Hilariously hideous integrals

Profile · Posted 2020-07-23, 07:27 PM

I got this idea from an integral on Wikipedia:

$\reverse \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{e^{itx}}{x^2+1}\,\mathrm{d}x = \pi e^{-|t|}$

This integral is quite difficult to solve with standard techniques from elementary calculus. Instead, the usual approach is to rewrite it as $\reverse \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{e^{itx}}{(x-i)(x+i)}\,\mathrm{d}x$ , then evaluate it as a contour integral by using the following contour that surrounds the pole $\reverse x=i$ :

The point of this approach is that it leaves the other pole $\reverse x=-i$ outside the nice semicircle contour no matter the value of a, which lets you convert the problem into a "simple" calculation of limits (e.g. by using the residue theorem). Compared to integration, the calculation of limits is a relatively algorithmic process that usually works without any "art".

So I figured, why not add more poles to the lower half-plane? After all, this shouldn't affect the contour, and you should still be able to use the residue theorem on a single pole. In other words, you should, at least in principle, still be able to find exact solutions to such integrals by calculating a finite number of limits, even if they might be somewhat... messy.

Well, as far as I can tell, they are. I played around a bit with this one:

$\reverse I_n = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{e^{itx}}{(x^2+1)\prod_{k=1}^{n}(x-k+i)(x+k+i)}\,\mathrm{d}x$

Obviously $\reverse I_n$ has a single pole $\reverse x=i$ in the upper half-plane, and its remaining $\reverse 2n+1$ poles in the lower half-plane.

Apparently I failed to evaluate any such integrals (except $\reverse I_0$ ) manually, but Mathematica returned some... interesting results for n=1 and n=2 after half an hour or so:

Have you seen any other particularly hideous integrals?

Chruser

Have you seen the following post on Stackexchange: https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...tegral-milking

I think you'll enjoy it.

Demosthenes · 12:19 PM

Demosthenes said: [Goto]

Have you seen the following post on Stackexchange: https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...tegral-milking

I think you'll enjoy it.

Nice ones! The techniques used to turn

$\reverse \int_{0}^{\pi}\cos(mx)\cos(nx)\,\mathrm{d}x = \frac{\pi}{2}\delta_{mn}$

into

$\reverse \int_{0}^{\pi/2}\ln|\sin(mx)|\cdot\ln|\sin(nx)|\,\mathrm{d}x = \frac{\pi^3}{24}\cdot\frac{\gcd^2(m,n)}{mn} + \frac{\pi\ln^2(2)}{2}$

look promising for a number of identities for orthogonal polynomials. For example, the Legendre polynomials $\reverse P_n(x)$ that I mentioned in another thread satisfy

$\reverse \int_{-1}^{1} P_m(x)P_n(x)\,\mathrm{d}x = \frac{2}{2n+1}\delta_{mn}.$

Also, I like this one from the book "Irresistible Integrals" (page 190) that was mentioned in the Math Underflow thread:

$\reverse \int_{0}^{1}(-\ln x)^{-\mu}\,\mathrm{d}x = \frac{\pi}{\mathrm{\Gamma}(\mu)\,\sin(\mu\pi)}$

It looks quite a bit like the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function, I think (where I replaced replaced its usual parameter $\reverse s$ with $\reverse 1-\mu$ and did a little algebra):

$\reverse 2^{1-\mu}\frac{\mathrm{\zeta(\mu)}}{\mathrm{\zeta(1-\mu)}}\, = \frac{\pi^{\mu}}{\mathrm{\Gamma(\mu)}\,\sin\left(0 .5(1-\mu)\pi\right)}$

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The 30 Most Hideous Gaming Tattoos	Vault Dweller	The Lounge	2	2007-10-19 03:16 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)