Adrenachrome said:
True but I think people should have the choice to go the religious route, One being that in order to have the choice to be right, you also need to have the choice to be wrong.
The other, organized religions are good for some people, imo
|
They should have the choice, but they should be presented with the evidence. It shouldn't be watered down because some religious organization wants it to be, it should be presented in full.
I have a problem with religion as a whole, but I am vehemently opposed to all religion that contravenes science. They just make the world dumber as a whole. Consider the following as a case study.
This is a nice illustration of the evidence behind our understanding of the evolution of whales, all in 7 minutes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2C-3PjNGok
Now watch a creationist explain whale evolution.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muqBzqWgHuY
Ouch. He complains that those wicked scientists are trying to turn the bible into a great big joke…but I think this clown does an even better job of that. Try counting the misconceptions — he goes on and on with this story about an animal crawling out of the primordial ooze onto the land and not liking it, and then wishing it could go back into the ocean, where it sucks in its hindlimbs and turns into a whale…and then he calls that story stupid and ridiculous. Guess what: it is! Of course, this ignorant nitwit is the person who made up the story, and it has nothing at all to do with what the evidence actually says.
This is what we have to deal with: morons who think their caricatures are evidence, and this bozo is probably voting for school board members based on how closely they approximate his level of idiocy.
If people want to choose to believe this, that is their choice. But they should have all the evidence. They shouldn't be exposed to what this moron has to say, because to put it bluntly, it's just plain wrong.