Posted because The1 thinks the American government did it. Prove to me that they used explosives. Again, why wasn't there more debri and dust shot everywhere if they used so-called C-9s? You can't calculate the damage a Boeing 747 would do if it crashed into a a tower, and you can't calculate the temperature of the burning fuel accurately. Get over it, you're wrong, quit being a damn liberal bastard.
Posted because The1 thinks the American government did it. Prove to me that they used explosives. Again, why wasn't there more debri and dust shot everywhere if they used so-called C-9s? You can't calculate the damage a Boeing 747 would do if it crashed into a a tower, and you can't calculate the temperature of the burning fuel accurately. Get over it, you're wrong, quit being a damn liberal bastard.
We could argue for hours. The proof is a building of that size cant free fall 8.4 seconds... Especially pancake fall like that.. Ive seen big buildings on fire with higher heats then the twin towers were and they didnt fall for 2 days... explain please.
I wanted you to post this in the flame section then I could of roasted you legitally.. Ha anyways mang.. You got no proof that they didnt so I win end of story.
We could argue for hours. The proof is a building of that size cant free fall 8.4 seconds... Especially pancake fall like that.. Ive seen big buildings on fire with higher heats then the twin towers were and they didnt fall for 2 days... explain please.
I wanted you to post this in the flame section then I could of roasted you legitally.. Ha anyways mang.. You got no proof that they didnt so I win end of story.
This has been gone over.
You can estimate how much damage a 747 crashing into a building will do. You can also put an upper-limit to the burning temperature of kerosene, as well as a reasonable lower-limit.
I swear this was brought up recently but I can't remember what thread.
Was probably me, I usually just try and get a rise out of people, but honestly, you think the Bush Administration could plan something so elaborate? Didn't think so.. that's my only stand behind it, we can't even fucking get a correct war strategy to effectively eliminate our enemies while trying to accomplish a goal, it's as simple as that.
Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Well, seeing as there is a lot of conflict in our government, I doubt they could even come close to agreeing to this. Having 100% of your government plan to fuck you over? Yeah, maybe in some third-world country. Just look at the controversey over the Attorney General. I think planning to attack two large trade centers, the Pentagon, and potentially the White House would receive way more attention.
Oh, and in that video that The1 posted, there is a part about Israeli's being warned via instant message. Keep in mind that there was roughly 4 years between that video and the attacks; more than enough time to make up fake stories and roots.
Hybrid Mode
