Sov's abusing Powers?

Lets see.

He's been editing people's posts all day. Banned like 6 accounts, including Grav's. Actually this past week has been a bad week where he has been making bad mistakes, and I was wondering if anybody else felt the same way I did....

Ah yes, and he brought up the fact that *I* was breaking the TOS, when in fact (MJ pointed out) The whole thread was a violation. None the less most of the stuff he posts are in violation, probably 60% of the posts on Zelaron are in violation, but Soverign likes to pick out which Threads he wants to edit the fuck up / close. Sounds like communism.....

State your opinions, please..

Guess I'll have to crack down on rule breaking posts more now, won't I?

By the way, I closed that thread because it was in violation of the ToS.

And how was that?

If thats the case, your gonna have to remove all of the threads with and F*U**cking curse words in them, aren't you?

Thats probably ... err... 100% of the threads....Go for it, see how long it is before your de-modded.

"Although the administrators and moderators of Zelaron will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of Zelaron, nor Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message."

I'll just start from this thread on .

Edit* Quit changing the subject Soverign. If you delete this thread, it will continue, another member will pick it up. The talk has begun, I told you not to push it but you going around, screwing with people's posts. Deleting threads with nothing wrong with them, the same quality posts that have been there created by yourself and other 'mods/admins' that violate the rules.

It's ok, nobody is really on yet that'll voice an opinion..... You'll delete it sooner or later when your integrity is questioned by several members. Good thing you happened to ban grav before he made the '4 names'. Thing is, you ip banned him to begin with and the names were made after. You banned him for 'flaming' you in 4 different sections, but nobody else gets banned, hmm. Thats right, you've banned everyone.

If I wanted to delete this thread, it would have been gone.

I'm only doing what the members want! I mean, gotta follow the ToS, right!?

Don't worry, D3V. You're thread will remain here.

Fact is, Sov breaks his own rules constantly. He gets high and dicks around, then is all "oops my bad" the next day. Tired of this nonsense.

If something breaks the TOS, and Sov deletes/edits it, shut up. It doesn't matter that "he didn't delete that other thread" or whatever.

If you're going 1 MPH over the speed limit, a normal cop usually won't pull you over. If he does, for whatever reason (maybe he hates Fords or something), no amount of whining will change the fact that you were, in fact, breaking the law and just got caught while doing it.

It's not an "abuse of power" to enforce the law as it's written.. though perhaps it is a waste of time/resources in some cases.

Well what my argument was he was not enforcing the rules against anybody else. He gave me a temp ban for profanity, when there were atleast 20 other active threads with profanity in them, in doing so I guess he was pissed he found out he was wrong, and removed the temp ban.

The staff is leiniant, and that is fine, it works good. They do their job accordingly, and that's why they were elected/picked.

Actually I'm a strong believer of picked law enforcement. You, D3V, should be banned for being alive

I accidently picked the wrong option. He is most likely being antagonized into using his mod powers, though.

Which one did you pick. (just to make sure), I'll change it for you.

Which one did you pick. (just to make sure), I'll change it for you.

I picked 'Yes, he is.' I meant to pick 'No, he's not.'

Sov changed the votes.

Sov changed one vote due to NGM's reqest.

Sov changed one vote due to NGM's reqest.

Considering the nature of this thread, don't you think that it would have been better to let someone else do that?

Yeah I don't think when his credability is at stake he has the right to *edit* somebody's vote. Bullshit, the Yes tally was higher before he 'edited' it.

According to the Whos Voted logs,
17 voted no
15 voted yes

But, 3 of the yes votes are in fact Grav's (banned users). So the correct number should be 17 no and 12 yes. So officially
17 no
12 yes
(Im not going to edit the poll at all though)

Oh, I see.