10th planet? Looks like it!

http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/...et-072905.html.


Wonder what happened to Sedna O_o

That's just Grav he went out to lunch. HAAYO!

That's just Grav he went out to lunch. HAAYO!

GO XENA!!

Definatly pretty cool.

Definatly pretty cool.

DEFINETLY pretty cool. Not "definatly." It's definetly. Do I have to shoot you?

HETEROSEXUAL. It's heterosexual... that's how you're supposed to be... jeez, do I have to shoot you?

What doesn't make sense is that they say it has to be classified as a planet because of its size, they say it must be at least as large as Pluto because of its brightness and that it's the largest outer solar system object ever discovered, but they also say it's the third brightest object in the Kuiper belt. Wouldn't that mean that there's two other objects at least as large as Pluto?

Wouldn't that mean that there's two other objects at least as large as Pluto?

That is what I was thinking as well.

Aren't those Sedna and 2004 DW??

Or maybe not...2004 DW is definitely not as big.

----------

Nice to see you back on the track to 100% activity Sov.

DEFINETLY pretty cool. Not "definatly." It's definetly. Do I have to shoot you?

ILL FGIGHT YOU OVER TEH INTERNET WIT MAGE!!!!!!!


.... Yeah, the way I spell definetly is one of those words I always spell wrong, but I am just so used to spelling it like that. Just don't shoot me.

Don't worry, I love you.