|
|
|
 |
Posted 2004-04-28, 02:15 AM
in reply to Penguin's post "Need your opinons"
|
 |
 |
 |
Like:
-The site is beyond good, it looks so professional and serious. It is a very good first impression.
-Without a doubt the speed of the server(from the test) is supreme, I wasn't expecting more than 150KB/s, and I was getting capped at 300KB/s(that is my cap).
-To negate the Client Login and TOS below, I would have to say the FAQ is perfectly an example I would use to tell you what you should do with the Client Login and TOS.
Dislike:
-One thing I don't like is the basic plan, it is 1500 Meg Storage and 15 gig bandwidth monthly. I honestly think it should be more bandwidth and less storage. Bandwidth should(in my opinion) be 15 times more than storage atleast, this is only 10 times. I probly would still get this plan, seems very good for a smaller forum, or a good fileservice for private things. This is not a very big down to me.
-Same as above with the other plans, the reason is I think people want more traffic than space.
-The client login page really dosen't have a layout, I think it should be similar to the site's homepage. Something this dull really turned me off.
-Terms of Service was in txt, that really bothered me too, I think that every page must keep an image of a professional site.
-FAQ looks great, but you should be able to click the question and it bring you down to the Question/Answer below.
-Under plans.html, this is minor but bugged me, the text for each plan(BASIC, ADVANCDED, etc) looked very dull, it seems to be a standard font and a pure blue, which doesnt match the site's blue shade.
-About us, this was very short, but its probly all you had. Also the link Websites Hosted gave me a "The page cannot be found". I'm also sure the list that would be there is under the permission of each person that owns the site.
Just because there are more negitives than positives here dosen't mean I didn't like the site, I would get if a 9/10(which is really good coming from me). I just wanted to focus on what I would improve than what is already great on the site.

|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|