Lenny said:
The waste.
Hmmm, would you really want it there piling up? How would it be shovelled away, by 7 people. All those animals.
|
It was only the basic kinds of LAND animals.
Lenny said:
Billions of animals.
There are more species of insects in 10 square metres of soil, then humans in the world.
|
Insects breath through there skin, water does not kill them. they were not on the ark. as the bible says it was land animals.
Lenny said:
|
Then there's loads of different animals. You want different "kinds" of animals? Count them all up, including the insects (birds, insects, mammals, reptiles) and you've got billions.
|
No actually its ony a few hundred thousand and they can all be named in about 2 hours.
The fish don't enter into it - they'll have been fine in the water.
I agree.
Lenny said:
The Disease
Of course there's disease! Oh, look, it's 2000 years ago. They can't have had disease, how stupid to think they did. How silly of me.
|
not silly, you just dont know any better.
Lenny said:
|
And "it's only 2 months"?! In two months, the great plague wiped out half of London. In "two months" the Black Death killed a sizeable chunk of Europe. In "two months" a host of fatal diseases could spread through the ark like wildfire and kill everything in it. With all the animals packed together, in awful conditions, with this waste 7 people can't so anything with up to their knees, a single virus (which multiplies millions of times inside one body) can infect every single animal.
|
but it didnt. Obviously. Nice theory though. Hang on to that.
Lenny said:
Home Countries and Offspring
If the animals hadn't gone off to their native countries, then they would all be in Turkey still, no?
|
They had to start somwhere...lol..see below
watch the video I posted.
Lenny said:
|
Animals also reproduce a lot quicker than humans. They'd be reproducing all the way home, so you'd see some kind of traceable line of animals out of Turkey.
|
Evolutionists even acknowledge that men and animals could once freely cross the Bering Strait, which separates Asia and the Americas.
The existence of some deep-water stretches along the route to Australia is still consistent with this explanation. Evolutionist geologists themselves believe there have been major tectonic upheavals, accompanied by substantial rising and falling of sea floors.
The Bible suggests a pattern of post-Flood dispersal of animals and humans that accounts for fossil distribution of apes and humans, for example. In post-Flood deposits in Africa, ape fossils are found below human fossils. Evolutionists claim that this arose because humans evolved from the apes, but there is another explanation. Animals, including apes, would have begun spreading out over the earth straight after the flood, whereas the Bible indicates that people refused to do this (Genesis 9:1, 11:1-9). Human dispersal did not start until Babel, some hundreds of years after the Flood. Such a delay would have meant that some ape fossils would be found consistently below human fossils, since people would have arrived in Africa after the apes.
We may never know the exact answer to every one of such questions, but certainly one can see that the problems are far less formidable than they may at first appear. Coupled with all the biblical, geological, and anthropological evidence for Noah's Flood, one is justified in regarding the Genesis account of the animals dispersing from a central point as perfectly reasonable. Not only that, but the biblical model provides an excellent framework for the scientific study of these questions.