| |
|
|
|
 |
Posted 2015-02-27, 08:14 AM
in reply to Demosthenes's post starting "I think KA's post explains it pretty..."
|
|
|
|
Quote:
|
The types that argue that God does not exist as if that statement is somehow factual would be considered gnostic atheists. Desmethones seemed to be approximately that in the past IIRC, though I could be recalling incorrectly and I wouldn't be surprised if his views have shifted over time (as mine have.)
|
Ah, what a lovely chart. Now it all makes sense (definitions wise).
Quote:
|
Your problem is with our PR department, which has not yet corrected this colloquial misconception. That's what I was trying to point out in my previous post.
|
Thanks for the clarification. I don't even think I have a problem with the PR department. I just don't believe in God, and I don't not believe in God. (sorry for le double negative). I fall firmly into the blue category in that proof does not exist. On either spectrum. I don't speculate into either theism, because of the lack of evidence. This isn't a troll, but I merely don't care for theism or atheism. I feel they are both wrong, because neither has proof. I like questioning everything.
This is why I feel Athiests and Theists are legitimately the same problem. They all claim to know without proof, and gnostics are even worse because they claim to have evidence when it's all conjecture.
 
Quote:
|
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
|
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Last edited by D3V; 2015-02-27 at 08:20 AM.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|