| |
|
|
|
 |
Posted 2010-01-13, 01:25 PM
in reply to !King_Amazon!'s post starting "Is there any use for a 3D television..."
|
|
|
|
I actually rented this from a RedBox near my house which actually had the '3D' version, and I tried it out on my 32" 1080p TV with 3d glasses and the picture wasn't rendered correctly, but as far as I could tell the PS3 had no issues playing it, just the TV could not correctly display it.
http://www.dvdboxoffice.com/mvi/blur...=1&src=froogle
I'm assuming by the time Avatar comes out there will be more 3D titles available, hence 3d players may emerge, but without the TV will it work?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10417449-1.html
Quote:
The Blu-ray Disc Association released its finalized 3D specifications this morning, outlining what to expect out of 3D Blu-ray in 2010. The specification includes full 1080p resolution, backward compatibility for both 3D Blu-ray players and the 3D Blu-ray Discs (meaning that both will play or be able to be played in 2D), and the use of a new MVC codec, an extension of the existing AVC. 3D playback will be "display agnostic," meaning that, according to the Blu-ray Disc Association, the format will be compatible across "any compatible 3D display." What exactly a "compatible 3D display" consists of is still a mystery, but a Blu-ray Disc Association representative said via a phone call that for the most part, you'll need a new TV set to make this technology work.
|
Also, http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10402438-1.html (refers to PS3 going into 3D gaming in 2011).
 
Quote:
|
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
|
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote] |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|