| |
|
|
|
 |
Posted 2008-08-19, 11:23 AM
in reply to HandOfHeaven's post starting "It's a fallacy to really link D3V and..."
|
|
|
|
|
No one should have to vouch for D3V. If D3V stays banned, so be it. If he comes back and then fucks up, he simply gets banned again. We shouldn't have to lose another good member because K_A has something up is ass and obviously has something against Thanatos.
|
I don't have anything against Thanatos or anyone else. I simply think asking for SOMEONE, not necessarily Thanatos or anyone else in particular, to vouch for D3v is just asking for someone to show that they think D3v has changed, rather than just say it.
The fact of the matter is, everyone here knows that D3v hasn't changed and he never will. Nobody is going to vouch for him because they know that that's a guaranteed ban for them as well. If someone REALLY does think he has changed and wants to vouch for him, I see no reason not to give him a chance. Hopefully they are right and he has changed.
However, if nobody trusts that he has changed enough to risk getting themselves banned, I don't see how it's worth the time or the effort of unbanning him and going through all of this again.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|