Thread: Rules revision
View Single Post
 
Reply
Posted 2007-12-18, 10:50 AM in reply to Lenny's post starting "Which rules would you change, and what..."
Quote:
No posting of pictures featuring indecent exposure
This needs to be defined, I've tried to have it looked at by just pushing my limits, and obviously that doesn't work. So starting a thread to discuss the limitations of what is allowed and not needs to be atleast reviewed. I mean, getting banned for having a picture of cleveage is ridiculous when you can spam profanity across the forums without it being a problem.

Quote:
No warez
I suppose I don't have any issues with pirated software, this rule is fine and probably protects the Zelaron name in itself.


Quote:
Limitation on discussion of drugs or weapons illegal in the US
There is no limitation now, there's a whole thread with a 2-3 members that talk about how fucked up they are. Either change this rule or abolish it completely.


Quote:
No creation of multiple usernames
Though this rule is put to decline in confusion from other members posting to be others, it's silly to be a rule in itself, I feel that if somebody wants to be schizophrenic let them, it doesn't harm anybody, and the least it could do is create more artificial activity like the whole -spector- situation seemed to have caused.


Quote:
No spam outside of the chat forum
Another non-enforced rule, either revise it or just get rid of it. There are various occasions where something could be done, but it never seems to happen.

Quote:
No flames outside of the flame forum
Same as above.

Quote:
No doubleposting
Same as above. Another old outdated rule that has it's constigencies that don't always apply.

Quote:
Rules when posting private messages in public
Abolish this rule, while as you can directly relate to what somebody had said to you, quoting it is not any different, and this rule is also pointless.














Quote:
!King_Amazon!: I talked to him while he was getting raped
[quote][16:04] jamer123: GRRR firefox just like quit on me now on internet exploder[quote]
...
[quote=!King_Amazon!]notices he's 3 inches shorter than her son and he's circumcised [quote]
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
D3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidencesD3V is convinced there are no coincidences, only the illusion of coincidences
 
 
D3V