View Single Post
 
Reply
Posted 2007-10-17, 09:50 PM in reply to Vollstrecker's post starting "Yeah, I'll go ahead and back you up on..."
Ugh.

http://seedmagazine.com/news/2006/06...p?page=all&p=y

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15750604/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6066606.stm

http://www.livescience.com/bestimg/i...cat=gayanimals

I think the fact of the matter is as humans we must label and catagorize everything in the name of science. Therefore, we must fit into certain groups. So instead of just being like all other species and simply get sexual pleasure from whatever pleases us we have to be "gay" or "bisexual" or "straight." The previous to being much more seldom, it goes with our nature to reject it and count them as outcast. Which I don't see is so wrong really. I mean certain animal packs reject the old, the weak and hurt, or even just based off of markings and such.
And yes homosexual tendencies, which really don't exist except in our system. So no animals in the animal kingdom seem to be completely GAY just by our standards exibit what we would consider gay.

Last edited by Kaneda; 2007-10-17 at 09:53 PM.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Kaneda is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
Kaneda