View Single Post
 
Reply
Posted 2004-10-16, 11:56 AM in reply to WetWired's post starting "Actually, it would be..."
WetWired said:
Actually, it would be
for(i=0;i<strlen(string);i++)
not
for(i=0;i<string[i];i++)
Actually, I don't even know why I did
Code:
i<string[i]
I meant to just say
Code:
string[i]
I'll go ahead and change that.

But yea, WW's method is better. Use strlen.

Last edited by Demosthenes; 2004-10-16 at 12:12 PM.
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
Demosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to beDemosthenes seldom sees opportunities until they cease to be
 
Demosthenes