I want to know where you get the impression that "Kerry is a pussy who will bend over to the will of the UN and allow us to be attacked?" Look at that statement for a second. Why would it be in the UN's interest to allow us to get attacked? It wouldn't. No president would allow their conutry to get attacked. It's not in the best-interest for the president, nor the country. The only difference is that Kerry, I hope, would not go around flexing his country's millitary might on other sovereign nations. Plus, hasn't our country already been attacked under our current president despite the fact that his administration had intelligence reporting that Osama was planning on hijacking our planes?

On a different view-point, lets just say, hypothetically, that Kerry exhibits signs of "pussyness," however you want to describe that. What's worse? A president who has already taken away our civil liberties, constantly kept us in fear of a threat that doesn't exist (Iraq), whose administration has put forth an interest in resurrecting concentration camps in America, ruined our reputation with other countries because we have been attacking sovereign nations over the past five years, and proselytized you and many others, or a man who hasn't even had a chance to show you what he can do. I'm willing to take my chances with Kerry.