| |
|
|
|
 |
Posted 2003-12-11, 03:05 PM
in reply to Penny_Bags's post "Atheists... what would it take?"
|
|
|
|
sh0e said:
mjordan2nd said:
sh0e said:
how is the explanation "logical".. its self contradictory if anything
claiming that there is no "supreme being" because there is no solid "proof".. yet they have even less "proof" themselves
|
yea...seriously that made no sense
|
maybe i need to make it more clear for you with an example
if i were to say that you are a retard because you have no "proof" that you are not a retard
how would i make "logical" sense unless i have "proof" myself that you are a retard?
thus it is self-contradictory:
merriam-webster on self-contradictory said:
|
: consisting of two contradictory members or parts
|
|
well...u just proved my point...it's just as logical to say that there is no god as to say there is a god because neither side has proof...
btw...is it illogical to say that the power-rangers dont exist?
no...it's perfectly logical to say the power-rangers dont exist...but I can not prove to you that they dont exist
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|