View Single Post
 
Reply
Posted 2003-11-21, 07:30 PM in reply to -=Rico-GP=-'s post "Loche Ness Monster"
the probability of a lochness monster is bigger than it's denial. Here is why: a few years ago in deep deep amazon archeologists discovered a bird-reptile that looks and acts as ancient archeopterics. Now that gives you an incentive that there is a ton of things we do not know yet abotu our planet. We have well-known dinosaurs living with us here and now. They are alligators/crocodiles; turtles, sharks, octopus to name a few. Now the whole loch ness thing is very possible, considering that because the lake is connected to the river system. A huge mammal may be living in the most obvious of places and yet stay undetected because people never dig in their backyard. a second possible loch ness was spotted around siberia, russia, but that cpecie is both water/land and is believed to be cold-blooded-thus freezes in winter like a frog, So tell me there is no such thing as dinosaurs.....
Old
Profile PM WWW Search
yarik83 is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-betweenyarik83 is neither ape nor machine; has so far settled for the in-between
 
yarik83