well i wrote SENSE (as common sense) and i wantend to do such cuz i though your post was actually quite accurate
About whay can be proven or not... Know about innocence presumption??? U have to prove that he's GUILTY not the opposite, and, there's no evidence of Iraki participation (more then that, Irak and Arabia Saudi doesn't hold particularly good relations and as i said most of Al-Qaeda members where Arabians)
But yeah, again, bush is using a scapegoat to go though their plans demolishing every human right that crosses he's patjh



PS:wish you understood what i say, if not... =P