![]() |
Testing yet another TacoX sig
#1
|
#2
|
There's no sig there.
*lifts rock* Nope. ::edit:: Now there's a sig. Is that you on the far left? Btw, that's kinda trashy.. |
Thats the whole idea
|
Ya... but it may not be so good of an idea.
|
I think it looks pretty good. Given the theme is to have the chicks obviously superimposed on there...for the humor...oh, dont forget the fake bling bling taco has around his neck...
|
Why the fucking shithell cuntwhore bastard sandwich are you using tacoX sigs and not mantralord sigs?
|
Quote:
|
Generically or generally?
|
Generically.
|
All sigs and avatars need to be what is generally considered decent. Furthermore, all women in pics posted must be wearing clothing. No black rectangles.
|
Fine.
|
Heh, thats pretty gay. What the difference between black rectangles and a bathing suit for example?
|
Black rectangles are like holding your hand over the indecent parts of a naked woman. If she were to walk out into public holding her hands over her private parts, it would still be indecent exposure. However, if she had clothing on, it would be acceptable. Perhaps a bit slutty depending on the situation, but it would be legal.
|
That's basically the same thing I said to him when I posted that "Faak you" Christina Aguilera pic a while ago. She had no top, but she was covering her breasts with her arms and hands, proportionally equal to that of a bathing suit or holster top.
I dont see the difference. >.< ,,|,, |
Quote:
|
Yeah, I remember that....
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.