Bush's State of the Union
 

Who all saw it?

Who all thinks Bush is an idiot?

I saw it...and some ppl might call me a cynic but personally think it was a whole buch of bs and he said some of that crap just to get his ratings up...

I didn't see it but I still think he's an idiot.

i saw it my opinion is we should kill em all steal all their oil then proceed to my their country and lake. Bush now has to make up for his Dad's imcompitence with his own incompitence

This is gonna be a good one, Grab the hotdogs it is wennie roasting time.

I think all of you are idiots if you think Bush is an idiot.

Tell me waht he did that effected you so harshly, and then proceed to tell me how your smart ass would ahve done it better. Don't go off speculation either, lets hear some hard hitting facts, and back up your arguements.

If not, Shut The Fuck Up about Bush and how you take 15% of Americans opinons and make them your own without formulating your own thoughts.

ok if i where him i wouldn't have to do it because my stupid ass father would have done it that is what i would have done better or invade iraq kill all the people then procede to steal the oil that is what i would do better

I think he gives ashcroft a little too much power. Personally I dont hate bush...he's done some stupid things and i could go into a whole lrngthy speech about what i would do were i in his position...but he's not all that bad...but ashcroft kind of pisses me off...

WOW! You hit that one right out of the park...........NOT! Jeeze, he said make up your own mind. All you did was say the same thing. I hope that we don't go to war, but war is always inevitable. His father new that, but tried to be reasonble. You can't just say blow all of them up, because the only one doing anything wrong is Saddam. His people have to live with fear everyday. If we go to war, we will have to be very aware of what we are bombing so we don't kill too many innocenst. i wish we wouldn't kill any innocents, but there is always casualties in a war.

And those of you who say oil isn't a good enough reason to go to war, think again. Americans use it everyday. It is the only way i think we survive somehow. So, we don't go to war, get no oil. Then what. Hydrogen powered cars. If we didn't learn from the Hindenburg, well, I don't know what to say. :D

Like I said before, we have MANY reasons for going to war. Our primary reason is NOT oil, although I'm sure it did play a role in the thinking process.

I have said why many times. Why I think he is an idiot. For some reason you never respond though..... probablly because you can't because it all makes so much sense.

NEWS FLASH!

Bush owns a huge ammount of oil on U.S. soil, do you really think he would profit from gaining controll of middle eastern resources?

probably would...bring up his ratings for one....and it would probably also settle the economy down to quite an extent if we were to get the iraqi oil...

hey i saw the state of union! BUSH IS RICH he like spent billions of dollars on a bunch of stuff!! and i thought people said the president did not have much money but wooooooo he spent tons of things to help the usa!

Absolutely wrong. His oil profits here would plunder horribly.

I shouldn't have to call upon captian obvious on this one, but
HE doesn't get the oil or the profits from Iraq, The only change would be that the oil form Iraq would be traded to us cheaper which would result in Bush's loss.

He is genuinly protecting the U.S.

And yea, you think you could do a better job as a president that as soon as he was put into office the U.S. is faced with the worst threat against us in the history of our nation?

Buch blows, did any of you happen to catch the Demarcate speech

NOW THAT IS TRUTH

Honestly there are things I would do different from bush...better or worse I do not agree with him. Ehh...i guess i thought we were going to get iraq's oil...and if we do get middle eastern resources it will be good for the economy and this i have gotten this from a source which is much more qualified to answer such a question then either me or you. But gaining resources from the middle east would be a side-effect to the actual reason of going to war...wouldn't it? We're not simply doing it for the resources we're trying to eliminate a terrorist threat...so this whole war thing is quite inevitable unless you want to have weapons of mass destruction in the hands of the like of someone like sudaam

Actually, either (1) I never saw those posts, or (2) they just made absolutely no sense what-so-ever, and I made a general post commenting to the mass idiots that are posting opinionated responses and playing them off as facts.

If he causes ww3 THEN he's an idiot, and we can tar and flame and hang him all we want.

Alright, but it won't start WW3. :)

If the Vietnam War wasn't considered a WW, then this certainly won't either, it'll just get another cool name like Desert Storm.