i don't believe they are signifigant, but they are hard for me to ignore because i find cryptography interesting.

Again, you're implying that they are insignificant, yet they are cryptography. If these are encrypted codes, then their was some comical, genius prophet who embedded these codes in the translated version of Drosnin's Torah. If not, then this is simply data mining, and therefore can not be considered cryptography. Which do you believe?

Well, if by relevant answer, you mean definite answer, then you're correct in your assertion. Nobody here knows enough about the Bible codes to give definite answers. But really, in that case, we don't know enough about anything to give a relevant answer on any subject. If this were the case, that would defeat the whole purpose of the thread. I don't think KA wanted definite answers, just what people thought about the Bible codes.

On the other hand, though, the whole concept is pretty simple. I'm not a mathematician, but it's not hard to see that all this is data mining. We do know enough to make logical guesses about the Bible code.