Nevertheless, I'm sure we could find buildings to have been brought down by fires as well. In the case of WTC7, the exterior seems to be succumbing to the heat far before the collapse:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/...78_634x402.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/...60_634x419.jpg

And WTC6 was a much shorter building with a much larger base, making it far more stable than WTC7. It might be why it didn't collapse. It's not as though it wasn't affected by the fire:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._SW_Corner.jpg

The official story seems completely plausible to me. This has gotten to be a somewhat long thread, so why don't you restate what exactly you take objection to with the official story?

The entire building imploded, not just down 15-25% of the building like the pictures you posted. WTC7 was destroyed all the way to the ground.

Oh, and WTC 1 and WTC 2 as well. I will label them plausible because they were hit by airliners. WTC 6 was between 1 and 7 and didn't fall, but 7 did.