![]() |
Dude I know the fucking difference you don't have to keep explaining it to me i'm seriously not that dull, what i'm saying is the reasoning behind the difference in avatars and post content saying that you can block out one and not the other is illadvised because blocking out posts never happens.
|
Clearly you're not understanding me. What I'm saying is that it's alright because if you put it in a post you're only putting it in ONE POST. If you manually put it in every single post you posted on the forums, it would no longer be alright.
The rule makes perfect sense, you're just too fucking dense to realize it. |
Quote:
|
Except for the ones who have jobs and visit from work and could potentially get fired for it.
|
Those boobs are too big.
|
yeaaaaa. i dont wanna see that
|
Quote:
|
Or maybe you're spewing gibberish and only you understand what you're saying.
|
Then make a thing that allows you to block someone's avatar and/or sig. But ya. Those are some friken big boobs!
|
Quote:
|
Nice. Got him owned there. Poor guy.
|
bt mon eh?
|
Quote:
Quote:
First, it's not that easy to just, "Hmm, I guess I could make a avatar filter." WW has too little time as it is to implement such a feature if possible. And two, I honestly don't feel that anyone got "owned" here. It's a legitimate discussion and the goal shouldn't/isn't to humiliate the other to prove your own dominance. |
Epic boobs.
|
aren't they your sisters?
hahaha i win!! |
Delicious incest. : D
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Back to the topic, shrinking the image to fit within the guidelines would be impractical if not impossible. It's nearly half a megabye and contains 117 images so getting it smaller would involve taking out images. |
Test.
|
1.You guys are stulid for not allowing that.
2.OOOOOOOLD Dev old |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site is best seen with your eyes open.